In a judgment delivered by the supreme Court of India, on 01 July 2019, is quoted of a trial court arriving on a conclusion based on the premise that, property acquired by
any member of the joint family would be presumed to be joint family property subject to the condition that the acquired property had to be such that it could have been acquired only by the aid of the family.
However, the Appellant has raised
formidable issues on facts as well as on law which ought to receive proper attention of the High Court, the Apex Court records.
The High Court will have to address the
grievance of the appellant that some of the
documents, which in the opinion of the
appellant are crucial have not been even
exhibited although the same were submitted during the trial, as noted in the written submissions filed by the appellant, the Apex Court has stated.
any member of the joint family would be presumed to be joint family property subject to the condition that the acquired property had to be such that it could have been acquired only by the aid of the family.
However, the Appellant has raised
formidable issues on facts as well as on law which ought to receive proper attention of the High Court, the Apex Court records.
The High Court will have to address the
grievance of the appellant that some of the
documents, which in the opinion of the
appellant are crucial have not been even
exhibited although the same were submitted during the trial, as noted in the written submissions filed by the appellant, the Apex Court has stated.
No comments:
Post a Comment